However, I do have differences with PMI. They are not huge differences, but they are there. That said, my real differences are with PMI-Fanatics. Those who believe all things should be PMI ruled are missing the the core of what PMI is about. PMI is a body of knowledge, not a methodology. You are supposed to learn it, stay current and practice it as makes sense for your organization/situation/project.
I am not saying there should not be a written methodology in place, just that saying 'PMI says...' is not the correct response, 'PMI suggests...' might be a better one.
I think the misconception that PMI represents a methodology is further complicated when it is compared to actual methodologies like PRINCE2. The fact that PMI (and the PMP) is for many people the initial gateway into professional project management also contributes to the issue with a loyalty factor (maybe its just familairty).
So what does a good PM do? What else should they look to? Here are a few suggestions:
- The already mentioned PRINCE2
- The International Project Management Association
- AACE International : Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering
Finally, just as Spock suggested that logic was the beginning of wisdom (not the end of it), I suggest to you that PMI is the beginning of project management expertise and practice. It is up to you to further your knowledge and practice by going out into the world, learning more, applying and then coming back to these methods and BOKs and providing the benefit of your experience to improve them further.
Matthew Levy, PMP
No comments:
Post a Comment